The environment notes said restriction scenarios were run both with and
without --loose, but the matrix records a strict run for the
packet-length restriction only; the interval and maximum-duration rows
were --loose alone. Say that, so the artifact does not credit
strict-mode coverage it never recorded.
No implementation, test or protocol evidence changes.
Two claims in the validation record were stronger than the evidence
behind them.
The maximum-duration Close conclusion was stated for every conforming
client. That does not follow: the deadline is evaluated on arrival, not
on transmission, so an echo sent legitimately before the negotiated
Duration elapsed can still be queued long enough to arrive after the
server's two-second grace and carry Close. Scope the result to the
loopback run that was actually performed, and describe the Close as a
termination path for traffic continuing or arriving beyond the grace,
including delayed in-flight traffic.
The document also claimed the validation was reproducible from the
commands above, while carrying only summarized client arguments and no
harness — the harness was disposable on purpose and is not being
promoted into repository infrastructure. Say plainly that this is a
record of the validation performed rather than a reproduction harness.
No implementation, test or protocol evidence changes.
Run the released upstream IRTT 0.9.1 client as a black box against the
Tokio server over explicit loopback listeners, and record the result.
Twelve of thirteen matrix rows pass and one is skipped for a client-side
CLI reason: IPv4 and IPv6 ordinary sessions, HMAC with a wrong-key
negative control, packet-length and interval restrictions both strictly
and with --loose, maximum-duration restriction, no-test, and midpoint
timestamps on each clock selection. No incompatibility was found, so
nothing in the implementation changed.
Two results are worth keeping. The single-field midpoint reply this
server deliberately emits instead of upstream 0.9.1's dual-field form is
accepted by the released client, which derives RTT and IPDV from it. And
the maximum-duration close is unreachable by a conforming client: the
deadline is the configured maximum plus two seconds while negotiation
caps the session Duration at that same maximum, so a client honoring the
Duration it was given always stops early. The two-second grace is the
measured margin already recorded in the protocol evidence, so this is
the implementation matching that evidence rather than a defect, and the
close path stays covered by the lifecycle tests.
Upstream source, tests and history were not inspected; only the
executable's version, help, exit status and normal output were observed.
No test in this repository depends on the upstream binary.
Nils Andreas Svee